Catégories
Archives Histoire

Who really resisted Nazism and fascism during the WWII (2)

Who really resisted Nazism and fascism during the WWII(2)

The resistance movement in Europe during WWII  played an important part in defeating Nazi Germany’s military might. The resistance movements – Europe’s secret armies or partisans .  were found in all Nazi-occupied countries, also occurred in Poland, Yugoslavia, Greece and Rumania. Within Western Europe, many would-be resistance fighters joined the communist resistance simply because it was seen as being the most successful. According to Jean-Louis Charles, Right from the start, communist resistance achieved a remarkable cohesion and efficiency because they had long been used to working underground.”   It is ridiculous and non sense to say, contrary to false insinuation uttered by the dominant anti-communist historiography, that the Communist resistance began only  in June 1941 with the starting of Operation Barbarossa and by order of Stalin.  What it would be fair to say that at the beginning, for fear of communism and in order to thwart the communist influence and to prevent any potential communist leading role in social unrest and social revolution, the ruling class in Britain, in the United States did its best by setting up rival anti-communist groups whose aim was less to combat  Nazi occupation than to resist the communist resistance itself. The French and British Munichards and the ruling class in the United States had done their best before the war, by allowing Nazi Germany’s rearmaments, by financial relief for War settlement obtained thanks to the two American Plans Dawes and Young, with the sole objective, helping Hitler to smash Bolshevism and to conquer the Soviet Union. the great landowners, aristocrats industrialists, bankers, high churchmen army leaders magnates of very kind in western Europe and the United States had never lost their fear of their own workers and peasants who might be the fuel for social revolution, perhaps one spearheaded and organized by communists. Paris and London sought to speed Hitler’s march and helped place within his grasp the necessary power for an attack upon the Soviet Union by opening the Balkans required to feed the Nazi war machine. Western elite’s support of Nazism and fascism was conceived as a force which would defeat communism and this support could explain the lack of fighting in the West during the winter but also the rise of communist resistance as natural and logical response to Nazism and fascism. Annie Lacroix-Riz’s new book, « les élites françaises de 1940 à 1944, de la collaboration avec l’Allemagne à l’alliance américaine », available since April 26 and of which I’m preparing a review, explains and exposes, thanks to its abundant archives research, how the French elites had actively collaborated not only after the 1940’s Blitzkrieg but since Hitler’s accession to the power in Germany in January 1933.

The history of the Second World War give us many examples showing that the hidden objective of the ruling class in the United states and Britain was not at all the defeat of Nazism and fascism in Europe but only to prevent the spread of communism on the continent and the conquest of power by the communist movements of resistance. First example is Italy. After Mussolini’s fall on July 25, 1943, American and British ruling class intervened in Italy in order to prevent the taking of power by communist resistance and the return of the Italina Communist leader Palmiro Togliattiwho had been in exile in Moscow during the Fascist era,  . After rebuffing the strong popular demand for the king’s abdication, they set up a government led by Marshal Bodoglio and Churchill in an address on February 22, 1944, gave the King support. In order to keep safe from communism in Italy, the Anglo-American ruling class deferred social and economic reform and instead of welcoming the Italian resistance fighters in the North as brothers, the first thing that they did was they disarmed them wherever as republicans and reds who migyhr cause trouble.

In Greece,  on December 3, 1944, after sixty-three days of fighting, Churchill crushed the communist resistance of EAM, a political movement of resistance against the German invaders and paved the way to civil war in Athens.  Churchill, took personal charge of its suppression by supporting general Vendiras who was bitterly anti-communist  and organized a new third brigade often called the Mountain brigade  with British backing on a purely royalist basis . In Greece, EAM had swept nearly the whole country but in order to thwart this popular and strong communist movement of resistance, Churchill helped the formation of a rival movement grouping Conservatives and Rightists who created with the of British General Scobie, after the British troops landed in Greece at the of September 1944, the Royalists Greek Brigade, the New National Guard. On December 4, 1944, Churchill decided in lieu of King George, the setting up of new Cabinet led by Themostocles Sofoulis.

 

Catégories
Archives Histoire

Who really resisted Nazism and fascism during the WWII (1)

Who really resisted Nazism and fascism during the WWII (1)

If the French is not a myth but a reality witnessed by the history of this period where France was under Nazi occupation, in the other hand, the lion’s share attributed to  Gaullist resistance in the dominant historiography  is of course a mere mythology owing to its main objective consisting of hiding or at least of minimizing the key and determinant role played by Communist resistance in the liberation of France from the Nazi occupation. This historical bias and the willingness to falsify the history of this period can be easily understood in the framework of  the Pax Americana and the United States anti-Communist Second Crusade in the aftermath of the WWII. The new book of the French historian Annie Lacroix-Riz whose new book « les élites françaises de 1940 à 1944, de la collaboration avec l’Allemagne à l’alliance américaine » throwing a new light on this period of the French history might give us in the same the time the main reasons underpinning the mythology of the Gaullist resistance and even behind it, British and American resistance against the « Anti-Comintern Pact » grouping German Nazi, Fascist Italy and imperialist Japan. In the following posts, I’m going to review Annie Lacroix-Riz’s new book and I will try to show its importance both from epistemogical and historical stand-point.

At First, the Gaullist resistance must be dealt with in its relationships to its British and American begetters and their hidden strategy by entering the Second World War. Of course, Britain had been attacked by Hitler who failed to invade as was the case with France. In this case, one can perfectly the resistant posture of Winston Churchill as resister against Nazi invasion of his country. But Churchill’s aim, that of his predecessor premier the appeaser, Neville Chamberlain and the British establishment general which had compromised and even encouraged and actively helped Hitler take the power in Germany had their own hidden agenda which was the crushing the Bolshevism and the Soviet Union.  Frankly, after 1940’s Blitzkrieg, the first that mattered for the ruling class and the political establishment in London and Paris was not at all the resistance against Hitler and Nazi Germany but to prevent a social and communist revolution inside France and Britain, refereeing to the Russian case during the WWI.  After the Blitzkrieg, London and Paris did not want to fight Hitler because France and Britain did no want destroy authoritarian systems, Nazism in Germany and fascism in Italy considered as the principal rampart  against the Soviet regime in Moscow. The Collaboration between Nazi Germany Fascist Italy and the so called western democracies did not date only from Hitler’s Blitzkrieg but it went back to the Bolshevik revolution and during the interwar Years period.  After the blitzkrieg of 1940, the ruling class both in France,  in Britain and in the United States continued its economic, military and political collaboration with Nazi Germany and it perpetuated its  policy of appeasement which was practiced before the war and since Hitler accession to power in Germany. How did we explain the posture of the conservative British Government under the conservative leader Winston Churchill who in the midst of  s desperate war, committed, according the Beveridge Report drafted in 1942, to implement a comprehensive welfare state and full employment if not by the fear of social and communist revolution inside Britain as it was the case in Russia during the First World War ? In short words, the resistance of Western statesmen in the United States, in Britain and in France is a mere mythology, because it was unconceivable that the ruling class in these countries might resist and combat Nazism and Fascism, those regimes with which they share  the same beliefs, the same prejudices, and the same convictions on the superiority of the white races over other non European races.

Translate »