Catégorie : Geopolitics

Catégories
Blog capitalism Geopolitics NATO Nazism

C’est quoi la Russie de Poutine ?

Russia im

On présente Poutine comme un homme blanc comme neige, d’une virginité et d’une innocence quasi religieuse. Poutine a été choisi par Eltsine suite à la démission d’Eveny Primatov du poste de premier ministre. Poutine, en ancien kgbiste, avait parfaitement compris qu’il fallait continuer la consolidation d’un capitalisme sauvage condition sine qua non pour continuer le pillage des richesses produites par le peuple soviétique depuis l’époque de Staline. Parmi les mafieux qui ont pillé ces richesses il y avait des anciens kgbistes comme Poutine mais aussi anciens dirigeants des Sovkoses et de kolkoses.

Poutine était prêt à entrer dans l’OTAN,il a intégré la Russie dans le capitalisme mondial.

Poutine a observé les révolutions des couleurs en Ukraine et en Goerge dès 2004 et 2005. Les services de renseignements russes n’ont rien fait pour faire avoter ces révolutions des couleurs. Poutine était le témoin de Maidan qui a propulsé les anzis au pouvoir à Kiev et laisser massacrer par le nouveau régime 14000 russophones du Donbass.

Quand la CIA voulait se débarrasser d’un régime récalcitrant, elle ne se gène pas citant Mossadefgh en Iral et Arbenz au Guatemala. la CIA a renversé le régime d’Allende au Chili en 73; l’invasion de l’Irak et de l’Afghanistan, l’invasion de la Libye avalisé par l’abstention de la Russie au Conseil de sécurité pour instaurer NO FLY ZONE donnant le feu vert à l’OTAN pour ravager un pays jadis prospère et massacrer son dirigeant.
seule la mort de Staline a empêche l’unification de la péninsule coréenne sous le régime communiste de Kim il Sung érigeant une zone démilitarisée au 35ème parallèle.

La victoire du Vietnam sur l’impérialisme américain, on la doit au soutien de l’URSS

Poutine a été grugé par la signature des accords de Minsk qui se sont révélés selon Merkel et Hollande une supercherie pour donner du temps à l’Ukraine et à l’OTAN pour moderniser l’armée et creuser des fortifications.

Il va sans dire que la soi disant guerre patriotique d’aujourd’hui n’a rien à voir la grande guerre patriotique de Staline et de l’URSS qui se battirent contre la soldatesque nazie qui cherchaient à en finir avec le régime communiste de l’URSS. L’OCCIDENT qui soutient le régime nazi à Kiev s’apparente à une rivalité entre des puissances capitalistes cherchant un immense marché et des gigantesques réserves en matières premières et une autre puissance capitaliste concurrente la Russie qui ne veut pas lâcher le morceau. La rivalité d’aujourd’hui entre l’OCCIDENT et Poutine rappelle étrangement les rivalités impérialistes d’avant la première guerre, entre le France, la GB et les USA d’une part et l’Allemagne, d’autre part.

Après la révolution d’octobre de 1917 et sa consolidation grâce à Staline, l’URSS a servi d’exemple aux peuples colonisés pour se libérer des griffes du colonialisme occidental; l’URSS a aidé la jeune révolution chinoise à se protéger te à se développer économiquement et même à se doter d’une bombe atomique grâce à Staline. l’URSS a aidé la jeune révolution cubaine à se protéger contre l’impérialisme américain et à l’aider économiquement et commercialement. L’idiot utile Gorbatchev, dès son arrivé au pouvoir, à couper les ponts avec Cuba.

Après la disparition de l’URSS, les pays qui se sont libérés des griffes du colonialisme occidentalisé ont été de nouveau recolonisés en l’absence d’un pouvoir capable de freiner les USA et leurs satellites. D’ailleurs, Lavrov, après le déclenchement de l’opération militaire russe, a voulu jouer sur le fait que l’URSS avait aidé les pays africains et latino américains à se libérer du joug du colonialisme occidental. Lavrov se trompe d’époque et de système politique, la Russie capitaliste d’aujourd’hui n’a rien à avoir l’URSS de Staline qui a aidé les républicains Espagnoles pour lutter contre franco.

un dernier indice que la Russie de Poutine n’est celle d’avant, cette affinité idéologique entre les extrêmes droites en Occident et le régime de Poutine.

Si je souhaite la victoire de la Russie contre l’Ukraine, et ce sera certainement le cas, ce n’est pas parce que j’ai affection particulière pour le capitalisme poutinien, c’est parce que la Russie a engendré une révolution, une première révolution pour défendre les opprimés et les exploités du capitalisme, la Russie de Staline qui a écrasé le nazisme au prix de 30 millions de morts pendant la grande guerre patriotique. Pour cette Russie multiethnique que j’admire où cohabitent des centaines d’ethnies et de religions que l’Occident capitaliste cherche à dresser les unes contre les autres pour faire voler en éclats la Russie comme l’ex Yougoslavie.

Catégories
Asia Pacific Blog capitalism fascism Geopolitics WARS & CRISES

The US,the biggest spying and surveillance Empire

China us base

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg called the behavior of unidentified balloons over the United States an example of how China and Russia are increasing intelligence against the countries of the alliance.

 

On Monday,the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin,said the US has illegally flown its high-altitude balloons over Chinese airspace more than 10 times without Chinese authorities’ permission since the beginning of 2022 calling the US the world’s biggest « Spying Empire » This statement was made following the strike of Chinese civilian unmanned airship used mainly for meteorological research purposes which was taken down on February 4. In fact, the US is the world’s largest surveillance and reconnaissance country, with the largest global spying network, the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson said.

 

Throughout 2021, U.S. and European “warships and planes carried out more than 2,000 close spying operations aimed at China,” including at the “coastal area of the Chinese mainland.” Although lavishly funded Western news agencies mysteriously found minimal opportunity to report on the incidents, the reader of the Asian press could have learned that Western “strike groups” in “the South China Sea” nearly doubled their activity since 2020—repeatedly to the protest of the Chinese and in fact most of Asia, though to the enthusiastic celebration of the Western liberal and humane press.

 

Since 2016, France has mobilized support for a European presence with annually rotating forces which have expanded with participation from a growing number of countries…The German frigate Bayern was deployed in the Indo-Pacific from August 2021 to February 2022 to conduct operations…and exercise with the navies of Australia, Singapore, Japan and the United States. Germany’s contribution was considered a key decision in forging French-German unity on building a permanent and effective European military presence in the Indo-Pacific. The United Kingdom has also delivered significant contributions to Indo-Pacific defense, decoupling a carrier strike group in 2021 and two warships permanently in 2022.

Recently, an unmanned US boat used to gather data underwater was discovered in the waters of Namibia. Local media generally believe that this unmanned boat is actually a US spy ship. The US has also frequently sent aircraft and warships to conduct close-in reconnaissance on China, with 657 flights in 2022 and 64 flights in the South China Sea in January this year alone.

 

The US’ National Security Agency (NSA) monitors the content of text messages and calls of political leaders in Germany, France, Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands and other European countries. The US secretly installed monitoring equipment in nearly 100 of its embassies and consulates abroad to steal secrets from the host country.

 

Catégories
Blog capitalism Geopolitics Histoire mineral resources NATO Nazism WARS & CRISES

Ukraine’s proxy war : Origins and development of imperialist war explained by Historian Annie Lacroix Riz

Russia ukra us

On February 24,2022, Russia launched special military operation aimed at De-militarization and De-nazification of Ukraine. Russia blames the West for provoking a coup d’etat in 2014 which has overthrown democratically elected president Yanukovitch by color revolution led by nazi militants. The new regime has been installed thanks to the support of the USA, namely by Victoria Nuland and the European Union. Considering the new regime set up in Kiev as a western puppet, the Russian speaking populations in Donbass snubbed the new authorities and decided to take in hand their destiny by setting up independent administrations. It was the beginning of civil war that lasted eight years killing 15000 civilians.

The question that begs : why Ukraine? What are its core causes ? The answer is giving by leading French historian Annie Lacroix Riz explaining the origins and development of the ongoing conflict between Russia and the West.

 

Catégories
Anti Russia Crusade Blog European Union fascism Geopolitics NATO Nazism Propaganda WARS & CRISES

HOW RUSSIA HAS FOILED NATO’S PLANNED ATTACK ON HER TERRITORY USING UKRAINE AS SPEARHEAD

Russia bander

 

One month ago, February 24, Russia’s Putin launched what Moscow called a limited military operation with two main objectives, to disarm and denazify Ukraine. In order to brainwash the western public opinions, to manufacture consent and to silence dissenting opinions, NATO imposed unprecedented censorship of all media banning Russian outlets medias, RT and Sputnik among others. Control of narrative on Ukraine is aiming at slashing from the collective memory all deadly and bloody wars waged by NATO since 30 years all over the world and by focusing only on the ongoing «war of agression» and «invasion» of «independent state» by «Putin’s army»

For western propaganda, Putin is presented as crazy and mindless by ordering military operation in neighbouring Ukraine. It will be unthinkable that the man who ruled the destiny of Russia during 22 years ordered the military to take action without a context and circonstances pushing to send Russian armed forces there. Instructed by the history of the collapse of the Soviet Union on one hand and by the current encirclement of Russia’s borders by NATO’s bases in eastern Europe, Putin has took the right decision at the appropriate moment to quell agressive and expansionist western hybrid war. This is global conttext that pushed Putin to move against Ukraine. But there is another factor that played key role in Russian military operation, often hidden from the public eye, a planned and already attack by NATO against Russian territory through Ukraine used as a rear base.

 

In fact, during a briefing on Thursday,Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said Washington’s was enraged because the plan to turn Ukraine into anti-Russia » and use it as a bridgehead for delivering all types of strikes » on the territory of the Russian Federation failed. »

« Apparently, it was not expected that Russia would withstand this blow, and the aggressive rhetoric and personal insults reflect internal turmoil, uncertainty, irritation with the fact that it did not work out, as it always worked before, and as it was planned this time, » the diplomat noted.

Russia’s military exercices that took place during the weeks preceding military operation were but a response to NATO’s already planned attack on Russian territory since 2014 coup d’etat and the integration of Crimea into the Russian federation.

On February 19 in Munich, Ukrainian President Zelenskyy made his threat to deploy nuclear weapons on Ukrainian territory. He expressed this as his unilateral revocation of the 1994 Budapest Memorandum, although Ukraine was not a signatory of the agreement. Two days later on the evening of February 21, Putin made his speech recognizing the sovereign independence of the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics, and the start of the military campaign in the Ukraine. He explicitly referenced Zelenskyy’s Munich nuclear weapons pledge: “This is not empty bravado,” Putin stressed in his speech.

 

It now begins to become more clear that Putin had serious reason to react at the Ukraine nuclear threat. A Ukrainian nuclear missile within six minutes of Moscow would present existential danger whether Ukraine were in NATO or not.

The primary bomb research facility was located  at the National Scientific Center, “Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology.” As of this writing reports of fierce fighting underway between Russian forces and neo-nazi Ukrainian Azov fighters who reportedly are planning to blow up the research reactor site and blame it on Russia. [v] The battle for control of the large Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant is also apparently part of the attempt to conceal the illegal Ukraine bomb project.

 

For years Washington moved one after the other former Warsaw Pact countries including Poland, Czech Republic, Romania, Hungary, Baltic States into NATO and closer to striking distance to Russia.After the demise of the USSR, Nato’s members passed from 16 to 30 members.

 

Kiev coup regime proceeded after February 22, 2014 to wage a war of extermination and ethnic cleansing of Russian-speakers in eastern Ukraine, led to a large degree by a private army of literal neo-nazis from Pravy Sektor (Right Sector), the same ones who ran security in Maidan Square and launched a reign of terror against Russian-speaking Ukrainians.  Battalions were formed of neo-nazi mercenaries. They were given official state status as “Ukrainian National Guard” soldiers, the Azov Battalion, financed by Ukrainian mafia boss and billionaire oligarch, Ihor Kolomoisky, the financial backer of Zelenskyy as president.

 

There was more. Ukrainian press reported a year ago about new Western-built de facto NATO naval bases in Ochakov and Berdyansk as, “modern infrastructure facilities capable of receiving ships of all types, equipped according to NATO standards and built with the money of the alliance countries.” The media boasted, “In three years we will be able to strike at Russian ships in the Black Sea with our mosquito fleet. And if we combine with Georgia and Turkey, the Russian Federation will be blocked,’ Ukrainian military experts boasted.

 

There was more. Ukrainian press reported a year ago about new Western-built de facto NATO naval bases in Ochakov and Berdyansk as, “modern infrastructure facilities capable of receiving ships of all types, equipped according to NATO standards and built with the money of the alliance countries.” The media boasted, “In three years we will be able to strike at Russian ships in the Black Sea with our mosquito fleet. And if we combine with Georgia and Turkey, the Russian Federation will be blocked,’ Ukrainian military experts boasted. “ [vi]

 

In addition, the US Pentagon had no less than eight, perhaps as many as 30 top-secret bioweapons research labs across Ukraine testing DNA of some 4,000 military volunteers. Once Russian soldiers moved to secure the evidence, the US Embassy in Kiew deleted previous mention of the sites from its website, and Ukrainians reportedly moved to destroy the lab evidence. Ukrainian labs in Kharkiv and elsewhere were operating in cooperation with the United States. Stocks of such weapons were being secretly  stored in direct violation of international conventions.

 

A full month before the Russian military action on 22 February in Ukraine, independent biowarfare researcher, Dilyana Gaytandzhieva, obtained documents detailing “US Pentagon biological experiments with a potentially lethal outcome on 4,400 soldiers in Ukraine and 1,000 soldiers in Georgia. According to the leaked documents, all volunteer deaths should be reported within 24 h (in Ukraine) and 48 h (in Georgia).” She details the human experiments, which include testing for antibodies against some 14 pathogens including  Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever, Borrelia species (Lyme disease) and others. According to the documents the labs in Ukraine and Georgia are part of a Pentagon “$2.5 billion Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) Biological engagement program which includes research on bio agents, deadly viruses and antibiotic-resistant bacteria.”

Catégories
Anti Russia Crusade Blog Geopolitics NATO Nazism Propaganda WARS & CRISES

THE LATEST HYPE OF WESTERN NARRATIVE: RESISTANCE,CONTAIN AND ATTACK OF UKRAINIAN ARMED FORCES

Russia propana

 

Of course, NATO is not engaged directly in Ukraine, it is arming Ukrainian Armed forces and training foreign mercenaries brought in the country to fight the «invaders», the so called «Putin’s army». But NATO’s non lethal weapon that annihilated Russia, is the infowar and the western unrivalled and unparalleled methods and techniques of propaganda that have been improved and developed thanks to the endless wars waged by the United States and its allies since the end of the WWII and chiefly since the demise of the USSR 30 years ago.

 

By listening to the western propaganda,especially during prime time,we have in the menu of TV news, the evil and crazy Putin, inefficiency and disorganized Russian army killing innocent civilian, sowing death and destruction in the besieged city of Mariupol, and but least not last, the heroic resistance of Ukrainian people who don’t hesitate to bear arms to fight the «Russky». Military high ranking, paid journalists list the Russian human and material losses presented in such a way obliging the viewers or the listeners to draw the inevitable and previsible conclusion that the Russian army has bogged down and even has lost the «war». This is psychological warfare waged by the West in order to hide its powerless and its incapacity to influence the course of events on the theatre of operations while in the past it was the west that commanded the course of events.

Over the past days, we are witnessing the latest hype of western propaganda fabricated by the US Pentagon according to which, Ukraine’s armed forces not only resist to the Russians advance but they take the initiative to contain and even to attack Russian armed forces.

 

Don’t be fooled by western narrative and its powerful psychological warfare. The Russian armed forces have achieved complete theatre control in many key areas, destroying the capacity of the Ukrainian armed forces to operate the types of major coordinated defensive and counter-offensive operations that would be necessary to reverse this fact. Even if major ground operations were successful, a large part of Ukraine’s heavy military equipment has been destroyed and the Russians will still have complete air superiority. The destruction of NATO tarining center in Ivarivo is an example of Russian control of Ukraine’s space.

 

Western media outlets harbour the illusions that the Russians can be defeated militarily and that NATO will protect and support them. Meanwhile, the longer and more intense the futile resistance of what remains of the Ukrainian armed forces goes on, the greater and more enduring the destruction and suffering will be. The only winner will be the United States and NATO , its military wing that caused the ongoing conflict with Russia and responsable for huge destruction and death in Ukraine.

Catégories
Anti Russia Crusade Blog Conservative Revolution European Union fascism Geopolitics militarismus NATO Nazism Propaganda WARS & CRISES

THE UNAVOIDABLE REGIME CHANGE IN KIEV TO DENAZIFY UKRAINE

Rusia ukra fasc

Western propaganda doesn’t recognize the existence of neo nazi groups nor nazi ideology that became since the coup d’etat of 2014 fomented by the West through its proxy and neo nazi stooges, throwing democratically elected president and neutralist Viktor Yanokuvich. Instead of Nazism or neo nazi militants, western propaganda has to resort to a euphemism by using nationalism and nationalists. A genuine nationalist is who refuses to align with one side against another one and in that regard,we can say without being fooled that the toppled president Yanukovich was a genuine nationalist as he refused to sign a leonine treaty of 500 pages with the European Union and the International Monetary fund seeking systematically to bleed the country. These were the real reasons behind the coup d’etat of 2014.

 

Since the 2014 regime-change in Ukraine,  Ukraine is ruled by U.S.-installed nazis; and they became immediately installed in the new government’s top ‘national security’ posts, and every elected leader in Ukraine now knows that to oppose their (those nazis’) demands would lead to the Ukrainian official’s overthrow and even to the person’s possible assassination by Ukraine’s nazi forces. The new regime installed in Kiev after 2914 was overtly neo nazi inspiration as the first measure implemented was to crush any dissent by prohibiting like Hitler regime after 1933, the Communist party and a dozen of opposition parties and then by fighting Russian speaking Ukrainians,those who massively voted for Yanukovich in the Donbass region and in North-eastern and south-eastern region. The Kiev regime started its pogrom on May 2,2014 in the trade Union House in Odessa where more than 52 people were burned alive.The responsable of the tragedy is Azov Battalion, a Neo-Nazi outfit which sports swastikas. They are fascists and murderers. And they have been integrated in Ukraine’s Armed Forces at the nod of the Pentagon.

 

The very nature of Kiev regime ideology may be seen through the UN resolutions condemning any sort of racism, including Nazism. The first such vote at the U.N. occurred just months after the regime-change in Ukraine, and was taken on 21 November 2014. Only 3 Countries, the US, Ukraine and Canada backed officially at U.N. Nazism & Holocaust-Denial; Germany Abstained After the 16 November 2017 U.S. backed once more Nazism as Trump Continued Obama’s nefarious Support of Nazism. The latest such vote occurred on 16 December 2021.

 

Current Russophobic hysteria speaks volumes about the dissemination and the widespread of Nazi ideology among Ukrainians as well among the country’s leadership as among the populace. The West was behind the nazification of Ukraine as many of its NGO and organizations invested Ukraine after the coup of 2014 brainwashing the Ukrainians and rewriting the history by glorifying nazi past represented by the infamous Ukrainian nazi, Stepen Bandera and minimizing or bluntly slashing the glorious Soviet victory over Nazism during the WWII where the URSS has paid costly price in terms of human losses and injuries estimated at 27 million people.

 

26 days ago, Russia launched special military operation with two main objectives: disarming and denazification of Ukraine. Belying western propaganda inventing fake resistance and fake heroes, the military objective was achieved as Ukraine main military infrastructure and equipment were destroyed. It remains the denazification whose stronghold in Mariupol is besieged but refuses to surrender which will be a matter of days. But Mariupol surrender is not all, and even with the fall of the next third city of Odessa will not give Russia full satisfaction as long as the puppet government originating in the coup d’etat of 2014 remains in position. To really denazify Ukraine, Russia has no choice but to change regime in kiev and to install new leadership vowed to pick up the pieces and to restart a long process that will take time and perseverance.

Catégories
Anti Russia Crusade Blog European Union fascism Geopolitics NATO Nazism OIL Propaganda WAR ON TERROR WARS & CRISES

HOW WESTERN PROPAGANDA INVENTS FAKE RESISTANCE AND FAKE VICTORY TO HIDE UKRAINE’S DEFEAT ?

The West is waging ferocious and relentless psychological warfare since Russia’s military special operations in Ukraine, a campaign aiming at brainwashing the populations according to basic principles of Nazi minister of propaganda, Joseph Goebbels that played key role in the manufactured consent and the mobilisation of the Germans for war against Bolshevism, communism in general and the Soviet Union in particular.

One can observe that there are the same so called experts who appear in the MSM and they repeat invariably the same words and the same things about the conflict in Ukraine. Their basic strategy is the strategy of delusion and deception by hammering the same message home, parroting without checking out all the facts what they have heard and told by the experts of manipulation working within the PSYOP. For example, such so called experts try to convince themselves and the viewers through TV that Russian’s losses are too big to win the war and the Ukraine’s resistance is so strong that Russian invaders would be sonner or later be repealed and even Ukrainian fighters would reach Moscow.

From day one, Ukraine’s fate has been sealed. Russian’s special operations have been focused on the destruction of Ukrainian principal military locations and command centers. This is largely accomplished since the beginning.
Consequently, Putin’s military Blitzkrieg paved the way for the second objective, removal of criminal regime in Kiev and establishing Ukraine as fully neutral nation. This main political objective would be achieved through

1. Demilitarization of Ukraine, meaning destruction of Ukraine’s Armed Forces and her military-industrial complex;

2.Denazification is only partially met by means of physical annihilation of military arm of the Ukrainian Neo-Nazism, the police and state security. The imminent fall of Mariupol gives the final blow to the last neo nazi stronghold. The fall of Mariupol would allow the Russian to affect more forces for besieging Ukraine third city, Odessa.It is a matter of one or two weeks. During the WWII, France capitulated. Germany and Japan capitulated. Why not Ukraine ?

Catégories
Blog Geopolitics NATO Nazism Propaganda WARS & CRISES

IS PUTIN CRAZY AND MADMAN BY LAUNCHING SPECIAL OPERATIONS IN UKRAINE?

Russia putin

 

 

Following Russia’s special operations in Ukraine, NATO is using like in its previous wars in Yugoslavia and Libya, what we can call it,information bomb or non lethal weapons. NATO’s strategy of deception,propaganda and psychological warfare take root in Goebbels’s basic principles, propaganda minister for Hitler Third Reich. When reading these propaganda principles, keep in mind that they were applied in wartime (WWII) and involve issues that don’t arise otherwise. It’s a long list, but Goebbels was dealing with the complexity of an all-out war. While reading them you may realize that some of the principles are generally applicable and not limited to wartime. Some might be quite familiar today.

 

Those basic principles can be summarized as follow:

1 -Avoid abstract ideas – appeal to the emotions.

  • Constantly repeat just a few ideas.
  • Use stereotyped phrases.

4-Give only one side of the argument.

5-Continuously criticize your opponents.

6-Pick out one special « enemy » for special vilification.

 

The objectives to be achieved are :

  • Hide economic and strategic interests at stake
  • Obscure history of the conflict
  • Demonize and transform victim into aggressor
  • Monopolise the airwaves
  • Prevent debate and silencing dissent

 

RUSSIA’S SECURITY CONCERNS AT THE ORIGINS OF PUTIN’S DECISION

  • The starting point of Putin’s decision is the coup carried out in 2014 followed with all those events in Crimea and in the south-east of Ukraine, in the Donbass, where people did not support the coup
  • The Kiev authorities began to conduct military operations on those territories. There were « two punitive operations » conducted, during which the squares of Donetsk were shelled directly, but both of those campaigns failed;

3-Afterwards, the Minsk Accords were signed, which showed a way to a peaceful resolution of the conflict. Russia was trying to make the process develop in this direction, in order to restore the territorial integrity of Ukraine and protect the interests of the people, who demanded most simple things: the right to speak their native Russian language and live within their own culture.

4- Instead, the Ukrainian authorities announced the blockade of these territories in response, disconnected them from the banking system, food supplies, pensions and benefits.

 

  • Since 2014, between 13,000 and 14,000 people were killed in the Donbas during the years of the conflict, while the civilized West preferred not to notice that.

 

7-the Kiev authorities started declaring bluntly that they were not going to comply with the Minsk agreements. On top of that, they were accusing Russia of unwillingness to implement the Minsk agreements..

 

8-Then they started talking about Ukraine’s possible membership at NATO. In this case, other members of the alliance will have to support the country, which could spark a war between Russia and all of NATO.

 

9-To crown it all, Ukraine raised the topic about a possibility to acquire nuclear weapons. They said that Ukraine would receive support from across the ocean.

 

And from that moment on, the fate of Russia will be completely different. Because then Russia’s strategic adversaries do not even need to have intercontinental-range ballistic missiles. They would be able to keep us at gunpoint with nuclear weapons right here, and that was all.

 

The two main objectives of Russia’s special operations in Ukraine are : Denazification and demilitarization as the two main conditions to address Russia’s security concerns.

Catégories
Anti China Crusade Anti Russia Crusade Blog Geopolitics OIL WARS & CRISES

US NEW STRATEGY TO COUNTER CHINA AND RUSSIA

Geopbv

In 2018, the United States government has declassified its Indo-Pacific strategy initially set to be released to the public at the end of 2042. The strategy was initially devised throughout 2017, going on to be approved and enforced by President Donald Trump in 2018 shortly after the US National Defense Strategy was finalised. At its heart, the strategy highlights a deep concern with China’s rising influence in the Western and Central Pacific and plans to deal with an increasingly belligerent North Korea, while seeking to use its South-East Asian allies to contend with China and North Korea and to strengthen India to counter Chinese military power.

Countering China in the South China Sea

The strategists highlight China’s growing dominance in the Indo-Pacific and consider Beijing as is the United State’s primary adversary and strategic opponent in the area. While the document does not mention the South China sea dispute, it reflects a concern over China’s claims there and in other parts of the Western Pacific. The strategy to counter China aims to build US capabilities until they are “capable of, but not limited to” denying China control of the air and the sea in the “first island chain”, referring to a string of Pacific islands surrounding China that include Russia’s Kamchatka peninsula, Japan, Taiwan, Philippines, Malaysia and Vietnam. China claims most of these waters. Second, it emphasizes the strategy emphasizes the need to defend the first island chain, and dominate all areas outside it.

disputed zones in the South China Sea

A US Navy oceanographic survey

Since last September, a US Navy oceanographic survey ship has been conducting extensive activities in a large area of the South China Sea to collect underwater geographical and hydrological data to support its submarine warfare in the region against China.

This situation also drew attention from some military observers after a US nuclear-powered attack submarine struck an unidentified underwater object in the South China Sea earlier this month, which again highlighted the US Navy’s need to learn more about the region.

The USNS Mary Sears (T-AGS 65), a Pathfinder-class oceanographic survey ship, entered the South China Sea on September 26 and started extensive surveys. From October 1 to 4, the ship operated in waters south of China’s Hainan Island, from October 5 to 9, it approached the coastline of Vietnam, and by Sunday it had arrived in waters near the Nansha Islands. The Pathfinder-class oceanographic survey ship is specialized in the detection and surveying of underwater terrain, meteorology and hydrology.

The USNS Mary Sears (T-AGS 65)

While the ship seems to be conducting scientific research, its true mission is to support submarine and anti-submarine warfare, the USS Connecticut, a Seawolf-class nuclear-powered attack submarine, struck an underwater object in the South China sea on October 2.

the USS Connecticut, a Seawolf-class nuclear-

This accident means the sea map the submarine was using was outdated, and the US Navy was conducting scientific research to draw underrates maps with the mission to support submarine and anti submarine warfare and help navigate friendly submarines or place detection device to locate hostile submarines.

Countering China and Russia in the Middle East

President Joe Biden’s Interim National Security Strategic Guidance Lt. Gen. Ronald Clark, who spoke at the Association of the U.S. Army’s annual conference Oct. 12 emphasized the challenges of strategic competition with Russia and China to American interests, including nonmilitary events taking place across the Middle East. The major challenges to the command’s operations are China, Russia, Iran and “violent extremist organizations around the world,” he said. But the commander primarily cited Russia and China, which he said are making moves in the Middle East to “set conditions for future operations.” 

Both nations blur the lines between competition, crisis and conflict. While it falls short of actual conflict, Clark said these actions are a part of strategic competition and will shape future conflicts in the Middle East and beyond. “Events in one theater will spill over — undoubtedly — to another,” he said. “Bottom line: All of our competitors are setting conditions in the [command’s area of responsibility] right now that we need to respond to.”

Middle East map

For example, China engages in unrestricted warfare, which consciously expands the battlefield from traditional domains such as land, air and sea to social spaces, politics, culture and economics. An important piece of that in the Middle East is the Belt and Road Initiative, which consists of a number of economic investments by the Chinese government and Chinese-owned companies in foreign countries. “The Belt and Road Initiative touches virtually every country in [the command’s area of responsibility],” said Clark, pointing to a $300 billion investment by a Chinese-owned company into the port of Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates. China continues to import massive amounts of oil from the Middle East, helping Iran build a new export facility that will allow it to continue pumping oil past the Strait of Hormuz. 

Hormuz Strait

Meanwhile, Russia is practicing its own form of hybrid warfare using nonmilitary means to create an operational environment where a smaller military force can come in and achieve its objective, Clark said. For example, a 2017 deal allowed Russia to expand the Port of Tartus in Syria, and it can now hold up to 12 nuclear-powered ships or submarines, he added. “That now allows the Russians — if they want to — to project power into the Mediterranean and into Eastern Europe,” he said.

Syria’s Tartus port

The US Central command’s area of responsibility is vast. It includes 21 countries that make up more than 4 million square miles and are home to 550 million people in 22 ethnic groups speaking 20 different languages.

Oil locations in the Middle east

Importantly for American interests, he added, it’s also home to vast oil reserves. Nearly 30 percent of the petroleum and crude oil products from around the world flow through three chokepoints that fall under the command’s purview. Clark pointed to when the supercargo ship Ever Given recently clogged up the Suez Canal for days as an example of the importance of those chokepoints. That incident disrupted 12 percent of global trade with an estimated cost of $9 billion.

 

 

 

Catégories
Blog capitalism democracy Geopolitics Histoire Propaganda

BINARY VISION : WESTERN DEMOCRACY VERSUS AUTHORITARIAN CHINA ? (Part II)

Democac

WHAT DOES REALLY MEAN WESTERN DEMOCRACY ?

The brainwashed western elitism depicts the United States of America as the first and accomplished democracy in the world. This cliché becoming with time commonplace has been perpetuated through educational system chiefly in law schools dedicated to form and train the future on one side and political propaganda used as a powerful tool of manipulation by the wealthy and the ruling class to deceive the masses and to orient the choice of voters, propagandizing for subservient conservative and liberal candidates and parties who, once elected,would legislate in the best interests of big business and the monopolies.

 

Translate »