Catégories
Archives

Comparative study : Nazi Germany and Soviet Union, why not Nazi Germany, the USA and Britian ?

Comparative study : Nazi Germany and Soviet Union, why not Nazi Germany, the USA  and Britain ?

At the end of the Second World War, began a second anti-communist crusade led by the new hegemonic power, the United States of America. the first anti-Bolshevik and anti-Soviet crusade waged by the United States and its European satellites had woefully failed. After the crushing Red Army epic and heroic resistance opposed in Stalingrad by the Russian people and its leadership at the price of millions of dead and huge destruction of the country, the Soviet Union emerged from the war as a rival superpower to Western hegemony, to the Jus Publicum europaeum, and to the American Century. Then began the Second Crusade, the ideological crusade against the Soviet Union, its political pattern and its leadership especially Stalin caricatured by the Black legend of Stalinism. This ideological crusade appeared through a Historical revisionism and historiography shaped in the likeness of American cultural, ideological and political imperialism in Europe and over the world. A lively historiography developed in the USA practised discriminative and ideological and Manichaean oversimplification of the historical picture. During this second anti-communist crusade, the appropriate weapon in the hands of American elites and western intelligentsia began a new and intense era of revisionism.

The striking example of this historical revisonim has been illustrated by the inculcation of Pavlov’s theory of conditioned reflexes associating falsely and wrongly, widespread by intense western propaganda, consisting of comparing political and ideological and economic  systems that all separated, mixing and putting in the same boat the racist Hitler and the anti racist  Stalin, the imperialist and expansionist Nazi Germany and fascist Italy with the anti-imperialist and ardent defender and the credo of the Bolsheviks and  Communist Russia, the defense of the colonized peoples victims over centuries of western imperialism over centuries.

 

Catégories
Archives

The Nazi-soviet Pacts : Stalin and Molotov’s geopolitcal masterpiece

The Nazi-soviet Pacts : Stalin and Molotov’s geopolitcal masterpiece

The 1939 Nazi-Soviet pacts were concluded on August 23 between Nazi Germany and the USSR. The Nazi-Soviet pacts include two parts : the Non-Aggression Treaty and the Secret Protocol. The Non-Aggression Tretay bound the parties : (1) to « desist from any act of violence any aggressive action and any attack on each other either individually or jointly with other powers ; (2) to give no aid to any belligerent enemy of the other; (3) to maintain « continual contact » for consultation about « problems » affecting their common interest » ; (4) not to take part even indirectly in any grouping hostile to either ; and (5) to settle any disputes or conflicts by friendly exchange or through arbitration commissions.

the Secret Protocol named the northern boundary of Lithuania as the line between  » the spheres of influence of Germany and the U.S.S.R » Through Poland the line ran along the rivers Narew, Vistula and San. In south-eastern Europe, the soviets called attention to its interest in Bessarabia and the German side declares its full political disinterestedness in these areas.. The text of this last article is important because of later disagreement between the two parties over South-eastern Europe.

the both sides regarded the pact as a purely temporary arrangement before coming together. When the Munich men, the British and French leaders discovered belatedly the soviet Pact they were furious and in a rage, because all their efforts made during the five-year appeasement policy had flown to pieces. Hitler thought that it was not aware to leave the British and French in his rear while hi disposed of the Soviets. this deep suspicion was confirmed by his Pact with Soviets which obliged them to fight. the pact surpised them since they had hoped to neutralize Russia and even to destroy the Soviet regime at the hands of the Nazi Germany;

On September 3-4, 1939, Hitler invaded Poland and promptly and easily destroyed. At present Russia is not dangerous  but no one can know how long it will remain so. in the meantime the partition of Poland had taken place without conflict between the soviets and Germans; After Hitler’s Blitzkrieg the German Government sent on September 3, 1939, an urgent telegraph requesting Russia to occupy her sphere of influence in Poland at once Molotov was surprised by the German speed and sought to avoid a joint announcement of Russia’s entry into the Polish struggle but agreed when Stalin’s draft was accepted;

Catégories
Archives

Western « democracies » and fascism united against communism

Western « democracies » and fascism united against communism

Not only Western “democracies” and their hypocritical politicians permitted German rearmament but they also hugely assisted it. At the very least a secure bulwark against communism would be erected.” The sturdy young Nazis of Germany are Europe’s guardians against the Communist danger” said lord Rothermere in the daily Mail on November18, 1933 “Once Germany has acquired the additional territory she need s in Western Russia her need for expansion would be satisfied” This was the basic calculation upon which the whole structure of what we called appeasement policy in the interwar period was reared.

After the Second World War, western propaganda tried to disseminate in the public two clichés : (1) that the German –Soviet pact of August 23, 1939 was the cause of the second World War and (2) that that the Soviet Union was so avaricious that it over-reached itself with its partner in crime. These two clichés had been published by the state department in January 1948 under the title Nazi-soviet relations 1939-1941. These clichés had then been published in the press aiming at public delusions and by establishing associate ideas and, according to Pavlov theory, conditioned reflex between Hitler and Stalin. Hundreds of newspaper articles and radio speakers had inculcated these clichés to many millions of Americans without ever suggesting that the Nazi-soviet Pact was the result of the long and dismal appeasement drive on the part of the West. It was this propaganda which contributed to create mentally conditioned peoples in Europe and in United States without a fuller examination of the issues and consequences at stake. In that event Walter Lippmann wrote on February 12, 1948 “this publication is a classic example of bad propaganda bound to backfire that the state department book was the work of propagandists and not of scholars is self-evident on the face of it. It contained only Nazi documents and no self-respecting historian would dream of basing his judgment on the documents of only one side of a grave historical event. Moreover, only those Nazi documents were selected for publication which bore on Nazi-Soviet relations after April 1939 to embarrass our Western allies and ourselves by inviting the publication of docuements for the period up to the Munich appeasement is not astute indeed it is altogether incompetent – propaganda”

Translate »