Catégories
Archives

American and British anti-communist crusade during the WWII

American and British anti-communist crusade during the WWII 1939-1945

On June 22, 1941, German troops invaded Russia’s borders, from the Baltic to the Black Sea. Finland, Hungary Rumania and Italy joined in the War. The first gesture of American and European political establishment was they all were overjoyed cherishing fondly the idea that Nazi Germany represented the only bulwark against Bolshevism and that Hitler was the only western leader having enough power to get rid the whole world of Communism.  Senator Robert A . Taft expressed the state of mind of the American political establishment and also the European appeasers by declaring » A victory for communism would be far more dangerous to the United states than a victory for Fascism » (quoted by Foster rhea Dulles, The Road to Teheran).

After the invasion and occupation of France, it was Britain’s turn where German bombers had spread fear and terror among Britons. Now, British leaders, those who had helped Hitler and Nazi Germany to relive during the interwar years through the appeasement policy, were well aware that Britain could never defeat Germany without tremendous military aid. Winston Churchill anti-communist crusade was common knowledge, he who had been the power house of Britiain’s huge effort to ward out Bolchevism in Russia during the wars of intervention from 1918 to 1920. in his greatest war-time radio speeches Churchill had said no word of his anti-communist crusade. For the British political establishment, it was matter of life or death and no matter how could be the ally able to save the power, be it communist.

When Hitler invaded Russia, the anti-communist political class both in United States and Europe was convinced that Soviet Russia was doomed to quick conquest and Russia would soon be eliminated from the war and the Soviets would be smashed quickly before aid could arrive. American War Department intelligence officers estimated only one to three months the German campaign in the Soviet Union and this opinion was widespread among military officers in both the United States and Britain they all agreed that the Germans would slash through Russia like a knife through butter and most gave the Reds no more than four to six weeks. This miscalculation was the product of western ideological blindness based on the impression that the Soviet system was a totalitarian system being maintained  only by terror, purges and the so called Gulag system. This false ideas had been deepened by Russia’s poor performance in the early stages of the war with Finland.

After four weeks of heroic resistance opposed by Russia’s armies to Nazi war machine, which was longer than the minimum life assigned to the Soviet government, American and British leadership began a new stratagem toward Communist Russia shaped at Argentia Conference off Newfoundland on August 9, 1941 at which the Atlantic Charter was drawn up. At this meeting, it was  decided to send a joint mission to Moscow for « help to Russia » through a lend-lease which was only a trickle and ridiculous support regarding the huge military need to resist the Nazi war machine. The Russians had turned the tide at Stalingrad before the alleged American and British help arrived.

the Atlantic Charter must be considered as the first step in the American and British anti-communist crusade during the second World War. This was confirmed by President Roosevelt’s message sent on December 5, 1941, to British Foreign Minister Anthony Eden preventing him of any agreement with Stalin about political agreement concerning Russia’s 1940 boundaries and in eastern Europe..

Catégories
Archives

American and European anti-communist crusade in the interwar years

American and European anti-communist crusade in the interwar years 1918-1939

the formative period of American and European anti-communist crusade began not in the aftermath of the Second World War, but  in the first three decades of Bolshevik power. American and European anti-Communist crusade abided essentially unchanged into the Cold War era. As showed by Denan Frank Fleming in his massive two volumes on the Cold War and its origins, the s called Cold War has rooted in the Bolchevik Red Revolution of 1917.  Frances Stonor Saunders in his seminal work on the CIA and the cultural cold war, depicts the strategy of the CIA which, through myriad of cultural networks and especially through its Congress for Cultural Freddom  run by CIA agent Michael Josselson from 1950 to 1967, succeeded by  gathering   under the label of anticommunism respectively, liberals, conservatives and an anti-communist left in Europe especially where there were strong communist parties like in France and Italy.

The idea of containment of communism do not date from the Truman doctrine but had been really implemented by the victors of the First World War through the Treaty of Versailles in 1919 and through the creation out of nothing of proxy states aiming at playing the role of what we called the Cordon sanitaire. This same idea of containment of communism had been also reaffirmed in 1921 in the Colby Note implemented to an extent, and coupled with trade, mutual engagement and collectivist social reform at home and through international agencies such as the ILO. This idea survived unchanged into the Cold War era. With the rise of the Soviet Union as great power in the aftermath of the Second World War, American and European had been stiffened breaking with the a soft » containment existent in the interwar years had been accused to be accomplice with the advance of communism and not its containment.

Translate »