Catégories
Archives

Double-standard Western Democracy

Double-standard Western Democracy

« Free elections » in Eastern Europe but not in Western Europe

Among the principal issues dealt with at Yalta Conference was the question of free elections in Eastern Europe. At Yalta Conference the West still believed that eastern Europe could be kept in its orbit, though these puppet states had never known what democracy means and no any democracy had ever been practised in this region since it was still ruled by feudalistic groups. At Yalta the Big Three agreed to assist all liberated countries in Europe  » to create democratic institutions of their own choice » and to « form interim governmental authorities broadly representative of all democratic elements in the population and pledged to the earliest possible establishment through free elections of governments responsive to the will of the people ».  The West would like to apply to the remainder of eastern Europe where the upper classes had generally collaborated with the Nazis. Also war-time propaganda and cooperation had obscured the differences between Russian and Western ideas of democracy.

As events speedily proved in Poland and Rumania and later in  France and in Italy, the Soviets and the Western leaders had different interpretation of democracy in their zone of influence. The first clash between Stalin, Churchill and Roosevelt at Yalta was related to Poland, its boundaries and the character of its Government. At Yalta, the three leaders had to resolve the existence of two Polish Governments, one exiled in London supported by Britain and another the new Lublin Government formed behind the red Army. the result was an agreement that the Lublin Government should be « reorganized by including a broader democratic basis with the participation of democratic leaders from Poland itself  and from the Poles abroad and pledged to hold « free and enfettered elections as soon as possible on the basis of universal suffrage and secret ballot » all « democratic and anti-Nazi parties » were to have the right to campaign.

As events speedily proved in Western Europe, the rule of « free elections » was a mere slogan and a propaganda directed against the Soviet Union and the socialist regimes in eastern Europe. these cocnlusions seemed to be buttressed by the venets between 1948 and 1951. On April 18, 1948 an election was held in Italy which was quite openly a contest between the United states and the Soviet Union. this was the first post war  election in Italy  and the Communist-Socialist bloc was given  en « even chance » by Western observers  to win  a 51 per cent majority.  When the vote were in, the pro-Western Christian Democrats  had 53 per cent of the ballots a stunning victory while the pro communist bloc polled but 30 per cent. the most important factor in the victory of the pro-Western Christian Democrats was the western propaganda  and the open entrance of America into the campaign the West proposed the return of Trieste to Italy. American motion picture appeals radio broadcasts bulletins and private letters flooded the land.  Not a day passed without the anti-communist majority of the press having a new effective American gesture to put in its headlines President Truman made Italy badly needed gift of 29 merchants ships ; gold looted from Italy b the Nazis returned the first Marshall Aid ships arrived and were unloaded amid ceremony and with a speech by the American Ambassador; the State department announced that Italians who were known to have voted Communist would be denied that dream of all Italians emigration to America;

Another example of the Western double-standard democracy. In the summer of 1951 parliamentary elections were held in France ; As in Italy the election law was rigged against the communists. the other parties could combine their votes in any given election district and if they won a majority, take all the seats except in communist Paris where proportional representation was preserved to protect the democratic minorities the two-sided election law reduced the number of communist deputies very sharply from 183 to 101 but the Red popular vote fell only 2,2 per cent. still standing at 26 per cent.

 

 

 

Catégories
Archives

The myth of Soviet expansionism in Eastern Europe (2)

The myth of Soviet expansionism in Eastern Europe (2)

What were the main motives, aims and purposes behind Soviet presence in Eastern Europe ? What did the Soviet they seek to achieve through their presence in Eastern Europe at the end of the Second World War ? The first driving and continuing motive was is security which was also the dominating factor in the outbreak of the so called Cold War. This imperative of security was not new in the Soviet foreign policy and its geopolitical perspective. The cardinal and outstanding motive behind the conclusion of the western propaganda called falsely Molotov-Ribbentrop or Hitler Stalin Pact was in fact a truce having requested by the Soviet Government for a security  purpose aiming at gaining enough time in order to build up its military defence and fortifications. how could anyone who lived the horrible war doubt it ?

Consider briefly the key facts. The Soviet Union had lost roughly 25 million of its citizens, 30 million made homeless and 60 million treated to very degrading and brutalising experience . The Nazis and their satellites destroyed completely or largely 15 large cities 1710 towns and 70 000 villages they burned or demolished 6 million buildings and deprived 25 million people of shelter. they demolished 31 850 industrial enetrprises, 65 000 kilometres of railway track and 41 000 railway stations ; 36 000 postal, telegraph and telephone officies ; 56 000 miles of main highway, 90 000 bridges and 10 000 power stations. The germans ruined 1135 coal mines and 3000 oil wells, carrying off to Germany 14 000 steam boilers, 14 000 turbines and 11 3000 electric generators. the Germans and their satellites sacked 98 000 collective farms and 2890 machine and tractor stations, slaughtered 7 million horses, 17 million cattle, 20 million hogs, 27 million sheep and goats 11 million poultry. the Nazis and their satellites attacked even Soviet cultural institutions by looing and destroying 40 000 hospitals and medical centres, 84 000 schools and colleges and 43 000 public libraries with 110 millions volumes. Some 44 000 theatres were destroyed and 427 museums and more than 2800 churches being wrecked.

keeping all this figures in mind, we can say that no people in the world who had first suffered as the soviet people have and then won a tremendous military victory would go into eastern Europe merely for the ride. They would be bound to make sure that the invasion gate was closed. Only then could we understand how the Russians feel about their security from future attack through East Europe, since Russia had been invaded three times through eastern Europe  Surely the Reds must know also that frontiers do not mean anything any more. After all those devastations of their country, the Soviets must ask themselves why they were denying the right to buffer zone in Eastern Europe when in the same time they observe  American military bases mushroomed all over the world, located many thousands of miles from home, in Japon and the Philippines, in Greece and Turkey, in the Mediterranean and western Europe all around the Soviet Union. How then can the Russians forget what they have suffered at Germany’s hands through eastern Europe during the next century. Soviet-Union’s security is the beginning of all wisdom in the period after World War II. without a keen understanding of the deepest and strongest psychological posture left by that war all else is vain.  On November 6, 1944, Stalin made it clear in his Party speech in a strikingly statesmanlike utterance recognized that « the only fact which overrides all others is that the aim of Russia is security »

Catégories
Archives

The myth of Soviet expansionism in Eastern Europe (1)

The myth of Soviet expansionism in Eastern Europe(1)

According to dominant belief and widespread ideas in the West, the Cold War was the logical answer to Soviet expansionism in Eastern Europe. Russian-Communist control of East Europe was the basis of western propaganda trying very hard to make believe that the Soviet Union was out to conquer the World. Was there really planned Soviet expansionism in Eastern Europe in the aftermath of the Second World War ?

it will be ridiculous to attribute to the Soviet Union any expansionist motives in Eastern Europe in comparison with Hitler’s crazy dream which was really based on  expansionist and imperialist motives. Contrary to France after Sedan defeat and her loss of Alsace Lorraine and Hitler claim to recover German territories lost after the First World War, there was no any claim on the part of the soviet union to recover all the gains of Peter the Great after the conclusion of the treaty of Brest-Litovosk. for example in Poland the Reds had a perfect reason to recover the 8 million Ukrainains and White Russians in east Poland but they never did so.

The Soviet occupation of east Europe was due simply and solely to the outcome of a huge war of aggression waged against the soviet Union. In this onslaught on Russia participated without exception all eastern European countries setting up by the West in the aftermath of the First World as buffer zone against Bolshevism; Finland, Rumania, Hungary and Austria were Hitler’s satellites and his step toward the soviet Union. Some 700 000 Austrians fought in Hitler’s armies and amount of human and matrial damage to Russains . the Finns also fought on several fronts other than their own. the Rumanuians carried out the brunt of the war in the southwestern Ukraine and they massacred 200 000 Soviet citizens in Odessa and troops were captured all the way to Stalingrad. All during 1944 there was no interference in Rumania’s internal affairs. Hungary helped Hitler in his invasion of Russia although the resistance of the Hungarian peasants who were forcibly conscripted by their native masters and sent off to Russia. At the Potsdam Conference Stalin said that the Hungarians had sent 26 divisions against Russia. Even Fascist Italy, as it was the case during the Spanish civil war, did her best by sending several divisions to Russia and Franco Spain contributed the large « Blue Division » Altogether the scores of divisions supplied by Hitler’s satellites contributed their full share to the immeasurable onslaught and devastation in the Soviet Union.

In conclusion, the Soviet Union presence and occupation of eastern Europe was not a planned aggression or the outcome of expansionist and imperialist motives but because of war of aggression waged by Hitler and his satellites to destroy red Russia. there is no other reason . It would be a mere folly on the part of the Soviets and the red Army to stop at their borders and wait. One can remember that at Teheran Conference Roosevelt and Churchill had agreed to concede a sphere of influence to Russia in eastern europe

Translate »