Étiquette : EU
Like in all previous wars waged by the United States,its proxy allies and NATO, since the collapse of the USSR, it is the same strategy of deception implemented, aiming à brainwashing the masses in the West,making believe that their deadly and bloody wars of agression against targeted nations have only double objective :getting rid of vilain dictators who were massacring and killing their people, and making the world safe for democracy.
The current war in Ukraine provoked by NATO expansionism since the collapse of the Soviet Union on one hand and Maidan neo nazi coup in 2014 toppling democratically elected president who refused to bind to drastic conditions imposed by the USA,European Union and International Monetary Fund. The main architect of Maidan neo nazi coup was Victoria Nuland, wife of the neoconservative Paul Kagan.The Maidan coup was openly supported and financed by NATO as a way of undermining any Russian influence in Moscow’s own strategic environment. The aim was to make Ukraine a puppet state, commanded from Washington, ending any link with Russia. There was not only the objective to annihilate political, economic, and diplomatic relations between Kiev and Moscow, but also to eliminate cultural, ethnic, religious, and linguistic ties between both nations.
In the wake of Maidan coup d’etat, an anti-Russian junta took power and institutionalized a racist and anti-Russian ideology.Kiev’s coup in 2014 is but a contemporary copy of Hitler’s Berlin, but that the neo-Nazi element is a fundamental point of post-2014 Ukraine.
Following Maidan’s coup, neo nazi militias became key points in the defense of the new Ukrainian regime. Groups such as the Azov Battalion, C14 and the armed militias of rightist parties such as Pravyy sektor and Svoboda operate freely in Ukraine and are most responsible for the extermination of ethnic Russians in the Donbass. The exaltation of Stepan Bandera (Ukrainian anti-Soviet nationalist leader who collaborated with Nazi Germany) is one of the symptoms of this. Before the Maidan, Bandera was a name like any other in Ukrainian history, but he came to be remembered and venerated as a national hero by neo-Nazis and anti-Russian politicians. These groups act with more violence and using more sophisticated equipment than the Ukrainian armed forces themselves, being the real face of Kiev’s anti-Russian brutality. As neo-Nazis, these militias have no obstacles in complying with the government’s objective of destroying any ties between Russians and Ukrainians.
The inspiration for Maidan neo nazi militias comes from the original Nazism: the Schutzstaffel (SS), one of the largest German armed political forces during the 1930s and 1940s, but the group was not part of the German Armed Forces, but a paramilitary militia instrumentalized by the government apart from the official troops. There was a major strategic objective with this: while the German military was commanded by the government, the SS fought for the Nazi Party and for Hitler – that is, if Germany surrendered, the SS would declare war on the German military. This type of “double-shielded” military system is the same one that Kiev has implemented: one can observe the same phenomenon in current war in Ukraine where neo nazi militias continue fighting the Russian forces in Kiev, in Dombass, in Mariopul and other regions albeit the entire destruction of Ukraine’s air forces.
Putin’s war over Ukraine is not war of agression like all NATO’s since 1991 mais it is the right response to denazify a neighbour country and to replace it a friendly regime. It is a measure that should be taken in coalition by several countries. In the West, Nazism has been rehabilitated and nazi groups and parties are encouraged as a mean to stand in the way of genuine left wing parties like in France with Le Pen. Russia is simply no longer willing to put up with crimes being committed by neo-Nazis against its people and there is nothing wrong with that decision
DEUSCHLAND UND EU FORDERN DEN AUFBAU EINER „INDO-PACIFIK“ ALLIANZ, EINES GEGENGEWICHTS GEGEN CHINA
Kürzlich hat der deutsche Außenminister Heiko Maas erklärt: « Der Indo-Pazifik ist eine Priorität der deutschen Außenpolitik. » Im Klartext muss Bundesregierung ihrer Aktivitäten in Süd-, Südost- und Ostasien, darunter militärische Maßnahmen intensivieren, mit doppeltem Ziel: Wirtschaftskooperation mit China aber ein Gegengewicht gegen Beijing.
Diese deutsche Doktrin wird unter dem Titel neue « Leitlinien zum Indo-Pazifik » veröffentlicht. Die Bundesregierung versteht unter dem Indo-Pazifik die Gesamtheit des vom Indischen Ozean und vom Pazifik geprägten Raums. Das Dokument plädieret für der Aufbau der ökonomischen Kooperation mit der Volksrepublik aber militärische Kooperation mit NATO-Partnern Japan und Australien. Eingeführt im Jahr 2007 von dem indischen Marinestrategen Gurpreet S. Khurana, ist der Begriff „Indo-Pacifik“ eine aktualisierten Version des Kalten Kriegs wo die Regionen nach Freund und Feind aufgeteilt sind.
In ihren veröffentlichten « Leitlinien zum Indo-Pazifik » zielt die Bundesregierung die Bildung einen « Schulterschluss mit den Demokratien und Wertepartnern der Region », eine Zusammenarbeit mit ihnen nicht nur politisch und wirtschaftlich, sondern auch militär- und rüstungspolitisch ; nicht nur die Teilnahme an sicherheitspolitischen Foren sondern auch die Teilnahme an Übungen in der Region, die Entsendung von Verbindungsoffizieren sowie verschiedene Formen maritimer Präsenz, die bilaterale Verteidigungszusammenarbeit, und Ausbildungsprogrammeder Bundeswehr für ausländische Streitkräfte Dabei handelt es sich vor allem um Japan und Südkorea, um Australien und Neuseeland, um den südostasiatischen Staatenbund ASEAN und um Indien.
How EU is playing India against China in Indo-Pacific geopolitical rivalry
On Wednesday, European Council President Charles Michel held a news conference in Brussels following a virtual summit with the Indian prime minister Narendra Modi in the framwork of what officially called the Bilateral Trade and Investment Agreement set up in 2007.
European Council President Charles Michel pleaded for reinforcement of “ strategic goals” and an “indispensable partner” amid increasingly tensions with China. “The EU and India are more than economic partners – we are political partners,” Michel told reporters after the summit. “India can count on the European Union, and we count on India to be a key partner.”
Michel justified the warmth EU leaders bestowed on India, by the fact that both partners share common values grounded on democracy and human rights against what it calls a systemic rival in China, witnessed by the last development in Hong Kong prompting Europe to consider a “revision” in its approach to Beijing. Michel cast light on the shared values between Europe and India saying “India and the European Union are two democracies with traditions and respecting human rights and the international rule of law. So we do have the potential to make further strides forward when it comes to the economy, the environment or digital issues,” he said. “When it comes to the political side of things, India is a partner because we share the same vision of globalisation, inspired by democratic standards, principles of freedom and liberty and inclusivity,” he added.
The EU and India will further develop security and defence consultations and military contact, including maritime security in the Indian Ocean.
Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission, said that India is a partner for the EU’s role of “defending our values”.
“We share a human-centric approach. That means using secure digital technologies to improve the quality of life of citizens, but at the same time respecting privacy and individual freedoms,” von der Leyen added.
The EU’s foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell, said this week that the “draconian” national security law Beijing imposed on Hong Kong “would require revision of our approach and will clearly have an impact on our relations”.
As a sign of increasing tensions with Beijing, New Delhi and Brussels also came up with a joint statement after the summit – a contrast to the inability of Beijing and Brussels to come to terms with President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Keqiang last month.